Aizawl, February 3, 2026: Regional organization Mizoram First has expressed concern over what it describes as the growing number of non-Mizo traders operating businesses in Aizawl under Mizo names. The organization has called for stricter regulation, improved monitoring, and stronger enforcement of existing laws to ensure transparency and compliance in the state's business sector.
 |
| Leaders of Mizoram First address a press conference at the Aizawl Press Club, presenting findings of a survey on non-Mizo businesses operating under Mizo names in the city. |
Addressing a press conference at the Aizawl Press Club on Tuesday, leaders of Mizoram First presented findings from a survey conducted across various parts of the state capital. According to the organization, the survey was carried out in October 2025 and covered 24 localities within Aizawl to assess the ownership and operation of commercial establishments.
Based on the survey findings, Mizoram First claimed that out of 122 shops examined during the exercise, approximately 76.2 percent were allegedly owned or operated by non-Mizos while functioning under Mizo names. The organization argued that such practices raise concerns regarding transparency, accountability, and adherence to local regulations governing trade and business activities.
The group also highlighted issues related to documentation and regulatory compliance. According to the survey, around 34 percent of non-Mizo workers employed in the establishments surveyed were allegedly operating without valid Inner Line Permits (ILPs). Mizoram First maintained that compliance with the ILP system is essential for maintaining legal and administrative oversight of individuals residing and working in the state.
In addition, the organization alleged that many businesses were not complying with tax and registration requirements. According to its findings, only 39.3 percent of the surveyed establishments were reportedly paying Goods and Services Tax (GST), while nearly 94 percent were said to be operating without proper registration. Mizoram First argued that such irregularities could affect revenue collection and create an uneven business environment for legitimate traders.
The organization further claimed that non-Mizo traders have established a significant presence in several key sectors of the local economy. Particular concern was expressed over the hardware and wholesale grocery sectors, which Mizoram First said are increasingly dominated by traders from outside the state. Leaders of the organization warned that this trend could have long-term economic implications for local entrepreneurs and small business owners.
During the press conference, representatives of Mizoram First stressed that the issue extends beyond business ownership and touches on broader concerns relating to economic opportunities, local participation in commerce, and effective regulation. They argued that stronger oversight is necessary to ensure fair competition and prevent misuse of legal provisions.
ALSO READ: National Defence College Officers Visit Serchhip and Thenzawl
To address these concerns, the organization urged the state government to strengthen enforcement of the Inner Line Permit system and improve mechanisms for monitoring commercial activities. It also proposed the introduction of a digital monitoring and registration system that would enable authorities to verify business ownership, track compliance, and ensure that traders operate within the framework of existing laws.
Mizoram First stated that such measures would help improve transparency, protect legitimate businesses, and enhance confidence in the regulatory system. The organization also called for regular inspections and stricter action against establishments found violating permit, tax, or registration requirements.
The findings presented by Mizoram First have brought renewed attention to issues of business regulation and compliance in Mizoram. While the organization has called for immediate corrective measures, it remains to be seen how the state government and relevant authorities will respond to the concerns raised in the survey.
The organization reiterated that its objective is to promote fair business practices, protect local economic interests, and ensure that commercial activities in the state are conducted in accordance with the law.
